LG TFT L1715SS - Bra el. dålig?

Wiktor · Post by **Wiktor** » 2005-08-25 17:49:54

Någon som äger en sådan eller vet något
om den?

Allt av intresse.

elvenman · Post by **elvenman** » 2005-08-25 18:08:01

Jag har en L1715S (antagligen föregångaren) och är mkt nöjd.

snake · Post by **snake** » 2005-08-25 18:29:30

CRT ROCKAR!!!!!!!!!

Explorer · Post by **Explorer** » 2005-08-25 18:30:36

snake wrote:CRT ROCKAR!!!!!!!!!

lol

elvenman · Post by **elvenman** » 2005-08-25 19:08:23

snake wrote:CRT ROCKAR!!!!!!!!!

Ehh?!? Och TFT rockar hårdare. I nästa post kan du väl iaf inflika någon matnyttig info som någon (mer än dig själv) har någon nytta av.

Enda nackdelen jag kan se med den är väl avsaknaden av DVI (digital ingång). Men det finns juh skärmar i typ samma prisklass med DVI.

Zezo · Post by **Zezo** » 2005-08-25 19:22:27

Sen att FTF skärmar är nere i ynka 4ms =)

Wiktor · Post by **Wiktor** » 2005-08-25 21:00:36

Tack för svaren.

Hur skillnad blir det om man kör med DVI.
Om det nu går att beskriva det i ord.

Zezo · Post by **Zezo** » 2005-08-25 22:04:31

Lånat från PCMech

"DVI is better than VGA for TFTs because they are digital and VGA is analog. A TFT displayes its picture digitally, pixel per pixel. Via DVI the panel gets data for each pixel, so the picture generated in the graphics card will match exact with the pixels on the panel itself.

Not so with VGA. First, the picture is generated digitally in the graphics card. Then it's converted to analog. In the TFT they will be converted again to digital (=> senseless twice conversion => quality loss), using the phase and the clock, and it'll be calculated which pixel should display what color. As the phase and clock can't be adjusted so precisely that a pixel of a picture generated by the graphics card will be displayed by the appropriate pixel on the panel. Means that the picture will be interpolated a little bit, which again means quality loss.

The electron cannons of the CRT need analog signals, that's why VGA is the best for CRTs and DVI would make no sense here.
For TFTs, DVI is the best. I won't get a TFT with no DVI."

Översätt från Engelska till Svenska med Systran

mattlos · Post by **mattlos** » 2005-08-26 14:17:09

Pumping_iron wrote:Lånat från PCMech

"DVI is better than VGA for TFTs because they are digital and VGA is analog. A TFT displayes its picture digitally, pixel per pixel. Via DVI the panel gets data for each pixel, so the picture generated in the graphics card will match exact with the pixels on the panel itself.

Not so with VGA. First, the picture is generated digitally in the graphics card. Then it's converted to analog. In the TFT they will be converted again to digital (=> senseless twice conversion => quality loss), using the phase and the clock, and it'll be calculated which pixel should display what color. As the phase and clock can't be adjusted so precisely that a pixel of a picture generated by the graphics card will be displayed by the appropriate pixel on the panel. Means that the picture will be interpolated a little bit, which again means quality loss.

The electron cannons of the CRT need analog signals, that's why VGA is the best for CRTs and DVI would make no sense here.
For TFTs, DVI is the best. I won't get a TFT with no DVI."

Översätt från Engelska till Svenska med Systran

Jag har en L1915S och kvaliten på den är identisk med dom DVI skärmarna jag kollat på.

madr · Post by **madr** » 2005-08-26 14:24:00

Bilden behöver nödvändigtvis inte bli sämre för att signalen översätts två gånger, man väljer snarare DVI eftersom man kan tycka att översättningen är två onödiga steg.